Ivy v. Commissioner of Social Security
Willie Ivy |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2010cv00953 |
April 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Craig M. Kellison |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/24/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 15 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's 16 cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER 20 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/14/2011. Plaintiff shall reply to defendant's 16 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 5/18/2011. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/7/11 ORDERING pltf TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING within 30 days of this order, why this should not be dismissed for failure to inform the court regarding consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Clerk is directed to serve on pltf a copy of the court's form "Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment." (Carlos, K) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/13/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's request 13 for an extension of time to respond to defendant's answer is APPROVED. Plaintiff shall file her response on or before February 25, 2011. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/9/2010 re 11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's request for extension of time to respond to Defendant's Answer is hereby APPROVED. Plaintiff shall file her response on or before January 11, 2011. (Duong, D) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/21/2010 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff the under signed's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ivy v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Willie Ivy | |
Represented By: | Ann M. Cerney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.