Lal v. McDonald et al
| Azhar Lal |
| M. D. McDonald, D. L. Runnels, M. Williams, N. Grannis, D. Piaz, Robinson, G. Carpe, Harper, Lockhart, T. Perez, T. Felker, S. M. Callister, D. Billings, R. L. Gower, L. Pickens, M. J. Norris, S. Hemenway, Filce, F. Foulk and D. Foston |
| 2:2010cv01051 |
| April 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/20/2014 DENYING plaintiff's 34 motion for an extension of time, as unnecessary ; and DENYING plaintiff's 34 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/05/14 granting 32 Motion for extension of time. Plaintiff is granted 14 days from the date of service of this order to file his objections to the 1/27/14 findings and recommendations. No further extensions of time will be granted for this purpose. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a courtesy copy of the court's 1/27/14 findings and recommendations. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
28
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/24/14 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiffs second amended complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim; and this action be closed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Azhar Lal signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/19/12. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/13/11 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of his complaint. Within 14 days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached notice of submission of documents and submit it to the court together with his signed complaint. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/13/10 VACATING 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit either the $350.00 filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order; and Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/14/10 ORDERING the clerk of the court is directed to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/5/2010 ORDERING pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, either the $350.00 filing fee or a properly completed ifp application; and the clerk to send pltf an ifp application.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
