Bridgeman v. United State of America et al
Harley S. Bridgeman, Jr. |
United State of America, Fremont Bank and TD Service Company |
2:2010cv01457 |
June 14, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
John A. Mendez |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/2/11 DENYING 90 Motion to Stay. Motion is submitted without oral argument. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 87 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/20/11 ORDERING that T.D. Service Company's Request for judicial Notice is GRANTED. Federal National Mortgage Association and Fremont Bank's Request for judicial notice is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by defendant T.D. Service Company 21 be granted. The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by defendant Fremont Bank and Federal National Mortgage Corporation 25 be granted. The Motion to dimsiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by defendant United States of America [5 6], which the Court construes a Motion for Judgment on the pleadings be granted in part. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 20 be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants. This Case be closed and all dates in this matter be vacated. The se Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez. Within fourteen days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all partes. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 84 ORDER denying 79 Motion for Recusal signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/15/2010. (Duong, D) |
Filing 54 ORDER denying as moot 50 Motion to Strike signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/8/10. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 52 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/1/10, ORDERING that the action denominated 2:10-cv-02619 LKK EFB (PS) be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Kendall M. Newman for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:10-cv-02619 JAM-KJN (PS).(Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/1/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 27 is STRIKEN. Defendant T.D. Service Company's MOTION to DISMISS the Second Amended Complaint 29 is DISREGARDED and Defend ant United States of America's answer to the Second Amended Complaint 31 is STRIKEN. Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint 32 is STRIKEN. Defendant T.D. Service Company's MOTION to DISMISS the Third Amended Complaint 44 is DISREGAR DED. The hearings in this matter presentrly set for the following dates are VACATED; 10/27/10 and 11/4/10. A hearing on the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Firs Amended Complaint 21 , 25 shall be held on 11/18/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman in courtroom 25. If Plaintiff wishes to file an amended pleading, he must file a properly noticed MOTION for LEAVE an Amended Complaint pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(2). (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/23/2010 DENYING 11 Request from permission to use electronic filing is DENIED without prejudice. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.