Burton, et al v. Department of Defense, et al
| Josh Burton and Wendy Sher |
| Department of Defense, Department of Energy and National Archives |
| 2:2010cv01698 |
| July 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/15/11 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice re 1 Complaint filed by Josh Burton, Wendy Sher. Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/7/2011 ORDERING 1 the complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend; withing 30 days from the date of this order, an amended complaint shall be filed that cures the defects noted in this order and co mplies with the FRCP and Local Rules of Practice; If pltfs' elect to file ant Amended Complaint, each pltf shall file a legible motion to proceed in forma pauperis together with the amended complaint; pltf's motion 2 to Proceed IFP is DEN IED; pltfs' 3 motion for emergency hearing is DENIED as MOOT; pltf's 4 motion to lodge video under seal is DENIED as MOOT; Pltfs' 7 motion to rule on motions is DENIED as MOOT; and pltf's 8 motion to rule on motions is DENIED as MOOT. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
