City of Yreka et al v. Salazar et al
| City of Yreka and City Council of the City of Yreka |
| Ken Salazar, Larry Echohawk, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Dale Morris and Michael Mallory |
| 2:2010cv01734 |
| July 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| William B. Shubb |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/13/11 GRANTING 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; and DENYING 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATED CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/8/2010 ORDERING 10 the Recorder's Office is prohibited and enjoined from accepting or filing any documentation changing title to the Property such that it is held in tr ust by any person or entity until this matter is resolved or this Court orders otherwise. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the enforcement of this Agreement until the above entitled matter is resolved or until the Court otherwise orders. The R ecorder's Office shall have no obligation to appear in proceedings nor be subject to discovery unless ordered by the Court. The Parties hereto enter into this Stipulated Consent Decree and respectfully submit it to the Court for its approval and entry as an Order and Final Judgment. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
