Cook v. CA Department of Corrections
Michael W. Cook |
CA Board of Parole Hearings, State of California and CA Department of Corrections |
2:2010cv02489 |
September 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Lassen |
Dale A. Drozd |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/7/11 RECOMMEDING that petitioner's 16 motion for temporary restraining order be denied; respondent's 22 motion to dismiss be granted; this action be dismissed as moot; and the district court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/23/2010 ORDERING that the 9/21/10 order is VACATED; ptnr's 5 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED; ptnr's habeas corpus application is DISMISSED w/ leave to file an amended petition naming the proper respondent w/in 30 days; and the clerk to send ptnr the habeas corpus form. (Yin, K) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/20/10 ORDERING that Petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.