(PS) Curry v. The Permeanente Medical Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Curry
Defendant: Permanente Medical Group, Inc., CNA California Nurses Association and Kaiser Permeanente Hospital Foundations
Case Number: 2:2010cv02592
Filed: September 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F Brennan
Referring Judge: John A Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/26/13 RECOMMENDING that the 57 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Motion referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C)
August 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 [DISREGARD - WRONG CASE] ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Daniel Craig Burgdorf signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/27/12. The Sheriff of Sacramento County or a designee shall collect from plaintiff' ;s inmate trust account an initial partial filing fee as set forth in this order and thereafter shall forward monthly payments to the Clerk from plaintiff's trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the inmate's trust account each time the amount in the trust account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee has been paid in full. (cc: Sac County Sheriff; Financial). (Benson, A.) Modified on 8/27/2012 (Benson, A.).
April 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/6/2012 ORDERING 49 Motion to Compel to DENIED without prejudice; the 4/11/2012 hearing is VACATED; parties are directed to meet and confer either telephonically or in person in an effort to re solve this dispute without court intervention; if such meet and confer efforts do not resolve this dispute, plaintiff may re-notice the motion to compel for hearing; plaintiff shall specifically identify what discovery requests are at issue; thereafter parties shall prepare and plaintiff shall file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement in accordance with LR 251(c). (Waggoner, D)
August 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER adopting 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/12/11. Defendant CNA's 28 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defendant TPMG's 12 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against TP MG for wrongful termination in breach of the collective bargaining agreement, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and breach of contract based on TPMG's math policy are DISMISSED without leave to amend. Plaintiff's claims against TPMG for wrongful termination in violation of public policy and racial discrimination are dismissed with leave to amend. Defendant TPMG's 12 motion for a more definite statement is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/6/11 RECOMMENDING that Defendant CNA's 28 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment be granted; Defendant TPMG's 12 MOTION to DISMISS be granted; plaintiff's claims against TPMG for wrongful termination in breach of the collective bargaining agreement and in violation of public policy and racial discrimination be dismissed without leave to amend; Defendant TPMG's 12 Motion for a more definite state ment be denied; and plaintiff be provided 14 days from the date any order adopting these findings and recommendations is filed to file a second amended complaint. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Donati, J)
October 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/20/10, ORDERING that pltf's 6 motion for leave to amend her complaint is DENIED as unnecessary. The Clerk is directed to file pltf's proposed amended complaint (dckt. no. 6, exh b) as a separate docket entry entitled, First Amended Complaint.(Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PS) Curry v. The Permeanente Medical Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
Represented By: David R. McNamara
Represented By: Christina Cusimano Tillman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CNA California Nurses Association
Represented By: Holly Lynn Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaiser Permeanente Hospital Foundations
Represented By: David R. McNamara
Represented By: Christina Cusimano Tillman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?