Espinoza v. Corvington et al
| Vasco Espinoza |
| Patrick A. Corvington and Corporation for National and Community Service |
| 2:2010cv03213 |
| December 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| John A. Mendez |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER denying 67 Motion to Revise the Court's Summary Judgment Order signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/8/16. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/21/14 ORDERING that Defendant's 48 motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim for retaliation under Title VII; Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's claim for racial discrimination predicated upon a theory of hostile work environment is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER 42 for an independent medical examination signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/22/2013. Plaintiff Vasco Espinoza will submit to examination by Robert F. Asarnow, Ph.D. on 5/14/2013 beginning 9:00 AM. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/5/2012 ORDERING 34 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1), Wendy Spencer will be SUBSTITUTED as defendant in place of Patrick A. Corvington, and all further proceedings in this action "shall be in the name of the substituted part[ies]." (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/25/12 ORDERING 27 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's first amended complaint is DENIED.
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/27/12 GRANTING 18 Motion to Dismiss; all claims against defendant Corporation for National Community Service and all Doe defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiff's Intentional Infliction of E motional Distress and Negligent Supervision, Hiring, and Retention claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; and Plaintiffs remaining claims, Retaliation in Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) and Discrimination Based on Race in Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, are DISMISSED with leave to amend. If Plaintiff wishes to file an Amended Complaint that is in accordance with this Order, it must be filed within 20 days. Otherwise, this case will be dismissed with prejudice. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
19
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/30/2011 ORDERING that case 2:10-cv-3213 JAM GGH is related with member of case 2:11-cv-2178 JAM GGH. Because both cases are already assigned to this Court, the captions shall remain the same.(Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
