Berman v. McManus et al
| Stanley P. Berman |
| Julie A. McManus, Leane Renee, Mary Henzie, Leslie Scott, Caroline Sheller, Chuck Eckerman and George A. Roberts |
| 2:2011cv00635 |
| March 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Nevada |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/25/2012 ORDERING that Defendant Leanne Renee's 44 motion for attorneys' fees and costs brought pursuant to California's Anti-SLAPP statute, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(c), is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant Leanne Renee is awarded $15,342.75 in attorneys' fees and $20.40 in costs, payable by plaintiff. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
42
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/05/11 RECOMMENDING that plf's fourth claim for relief be dismissed with prejudice to the extent that it alleges a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against def endant Mary Henzie; the court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining claim in this case, all of which are brought pursuant to state law and case to be closed. Objections to these F&Rs due w/i 14 days; referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER adopting 32 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/28/11: Defendants Leslie Scott and Caroline Sheller's motion to dismiss is GRANTED 7 . Defendant Leane Renee's special motion to strike and motion to dismiss is GRANTED 12 . Defendant Julie McManus's motion to dismiss is GRANTED 15 . Defendant George A. Roberts's motion to dismiss 9 is GRANTED in part and the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims against Roberts.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/31/11 GRANTING Defendants Leslie Scott and Caroline Sheller's request for judicial notice, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART AS MOOT Defendant Leane Rene e's request for judicial notice, and GRANTING Defendant George A. Roberts' request for judicial notice and incorporation of documents by reference. Within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a written opposition to the proposed sua sponte dismissal of his fourth claim. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that 7 Motion to Dismiss, 12 Motion to Dismiss, and 15 Amended Motion to Dismiss be granted and 9 Motion to Dismiss be granted in part. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Motions referred to District Judge Morrison C. England.(Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/20/11 ORDERING the plaintiff shall file on or before 4/29/11, a response to defendant Hanzie's ex parte request for an extension of time within which to file her answer to the complaint. I f plaintiff does not oppose the granting of Henzie's request, plaintiff response shall include a statement of non-opposition to the granting of the request. Plaintiff's failure to timely respond to this order will be deemed consent to the granting of the request. Plaintiff's response shall not exceed five pages in length.(Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
