Key, et al v. IndyMac Bank
Plaintiff: James A. Key and Denise Key
Defendant: IndyMac Bank, Aztec Foreclosure Corporation and Indymac Mortgage Services, a division of One West Bank, FSB
Case Number: 2:2011cv00650
Filed: March 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/14/2011 ORDERING that the 17 findings and recommendations filed May 13, 2011 are adopted in full. Plaintiffs' 11 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED.(Duong, D)
June 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/9/2011 recommending that the 15 motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction be granted and this action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Objections due within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Duong, D)
May 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/12/2011 recommending that plaintiffs' 11 motion for temporary restraining order be denied. Objections due within seven days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Duong, D)
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/5/11 ORDERING the defendant Indymac Mortgage Services to respond to 11 Motion for TRO no later than close of business 5/11/11 at 5:00 p.m. (Donati, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Key, et al v. IndyMac Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James A. Key
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Key
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IndyMac Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aztec Foreclosure Corporation
Represented By: Robin Prema Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indymac Mortgage Services, a division of One West Bank, FSB
Represented By: Nicholas B. Waranoff
Represented By: Chu-Hsin Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?