Gempesaw v. Recontrust Company N.A. et al
| Federico J. Gempesaw |
| Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Recontrust Company N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Bank of America Home Loans |
| 2:2011cv00811 |
| March 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/15/2011 ORDERING that the hearing on dfts' 10 amended motion to dismiss set for 7/7/2011 is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that pltfs case be dismissed with prejud ice as to all defendants pursuant to FRCP 41(b) and LR 110 and 183(a); the Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case and vacate all future dates in the case; Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/1/11 ORDERING the hearing as to 10 Amended Motion to Dismiss is reset to 7/7/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman; Plaintiff shall file a written response to the motion to dismiss, or a statement of non-opposition on or before 6/9/11; and defendants may file a written reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 6/23/11. (Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
