Wichelman v. County of Sacramento et al
| Karl Wichelman |
| John Otter, County of Sacramento, Sacramento Sheriff Department, Sacramento District Attorney Office, Starr McKersie and Stacy Waggoner |
| 2:2011cv00915 |
| April 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/15/12: ORDERING that the status (pretrial scheduling) conference currently set for hearing on May 23, 2012 is vacated. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff at his address of record, as well as via electronic mail. RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. F&R referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/4/12 VACATING 30 Findings and Recommendations; RESETTING Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for 5/23/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; and ORDERING parties to file on or before 5/9/12 either a joint status report or separate status reporst addressing the matters set forth in the 5/5/11 order. Failure of plaintiff to comply with this order will result in the imposition of sanctions, incl uding a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and/or for failure to comply with this court's orders and Local Rules. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff at his address of record, as well as via electronic mail. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2012 VACATING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 2/29/2012; RECOMMENDING that the 1 Complaint be dismissed and that the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/9/12 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED from 1/18/2012 to 2/29/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, on or before 2/8/2012, why sanctions should not be imposed. Also, on or before 2/8/2012, plaintiff shall file a status report. Defendants the County of Sacramento (sued as the Sacramento Sheriff Department and the Sacramento Distri ct Attorneys Office), Starr McKersie, and Stacy Waggoner are not required to file a further status report or a response to plaintiff's status report, but if they elect to do so, any such status report or response to plaintiff's status report shall be filed on or before 2/15/2012. (Kastilahn, A) (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/4/11 RESCHEDULING Status Conference for 1/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Show Cause Response why sanctions should not be impo sed for faiure to file a status report in compliance with the court's 9/20/11 Order due by 1/4/2012; on or before 12/14/11 the parties shall meet and confer, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f); on or before 1/4/12, the parties shall file a joint status report setting forth the matters referenced in the courts 5/5/11 Order. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/05/11 ORDERING that plf's Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; plf shall show cause, in writing, by 11/02/11, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file a status report in compliance with the court's 05/05/11 order; the Initial Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to 11/16/11 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; parties shall file a status report by 11/02/11. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/6/11: The status conference is CONTINUED to 11/2/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The parties shall show cause, in writing, on or b efore October 19, 2011, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file a status report in compliance with the court's May 5, 2011 order. Also by October 19, 2011, the parties shall file a status report setting forth the matters referenced in the court's May 5, 2011 order. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/7/2011 ORDERING 7 Motion for Extension of time to provide service documents to US Marshal is GRANTED; as provided in 4 Order, plaintiff shall supply USM, within 14 days from date of this ord er, all information needed to effectuate service of process, and shall, 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM; 7 Reqest for copies of Plantiff's service documents is DENIED. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/5/11, GRANTING plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 3 . The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith all process pursuant to FRCP 4. The Clerk shall send plaintiff seven USM-285 f orms, one summons, a copy of the complaint, this court's scheduling order, the consent form to proceed before a magistrate judge, and the court's voluntary dispute resolution program. Plaintiff shall supply the USM, within 14 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the USM to effect service of process, and shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM shall serve process, with co pies of this court's scheduling order and related documents, within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiff, without prepayment of costs. The USM shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been served.(Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
