Chestang et al v. Yahoo, Inc
Plaintiff: Daniel K. Chestang and Tiffany Vigil
Defendant: Yahoo, Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv00989
Filed: April 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/30/13. The Court has reviewed the record and finds that the appeal is frivolous and is not taken in good faith. Revocation of Plaintiff's in forma status is therefore appropriate. (cc: 9th Circuit) (Manzer, C)
March 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/5/2013 ORDERING 62 that Plaintiff's Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DISREGARDED. (Reader, L)
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/14/2013 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 55 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendant's 50 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; this action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
December 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/6/2012 RECOMMENDING that Defendant's 50 motion to dismiss be granted. Plaintiff's 49 third amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Motion referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
September 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/6/12: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 35 is granted. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of se rvice of this order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff's "Motion to Request Judgment and Relief" 43 and plaintiff's "Motion to Amend Motion to Request Ruling Due To Newly Discovered Evidence" 44 are both denied. (Kaminski, H)
April 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/5/12 ORDERING that Ms. Vigil shall notify the court of her current address within 14 days of the date of this order. Should Ms. Vigil fail to do so, the undersigned will recommend that Ms. Vigil be dismissed from this action. (Kastilahn, A)
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Daniel K. Chestang signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/27/2011 ORDERING Sheriff of Solano County to collect monthly payments and forward to the Court. The Clerk to serve a copy of this order and a copy of Pltf's IFP on the Sheriff of Solano County. Clerk directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the Court. (cc: Financial) (Zignago, K.)
June 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/21/11 ORDERING that Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission and submit the following documents to the court: A complete Applica tion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner, including a completed and signed "Certification" at the bottom of the Application's second page; and a certified copy of plaintiff's prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/6/2011 ORDERING that w/i 30 days from date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission and submit the required documents to the court; Clerk is directed to provide Plaintiff with a new IFP application by Prisoner; Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (Waggoner, D)
May 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/11/11 ORDERING that plf shall pay the requisite filing fee in this action no later w/i 30 days; alternatively, plf shall submit an IFP application, trust account statement and certificate of funds w/i 30 days. Failure to pay the filing fee or file the requisite documents w/i the 30 day deadline shall result in dismissal of this action. Clerk to send plf IFP form. (Benson, A.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chestang et al v. Yahoo, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yahoo, Inc
Represented By: Michele Floyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel K. Chestang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Vigil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?