Kurtz v. Intelius, Inc et al

Kurtz v. Intelius, Inc et al

Plaintiff:	Michael Kurtz
Defendant:	Intelius, Inc, Adaptive Marketing LLC and Intelius Sales Company LLC
Case Number:	2:2011cv01009
Filed:	April 15, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	John A. Mendez
Presiding Judge:	John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit:	Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 9, 2011	Filing 54 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Transfer signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/8/11: CASE TRANSFERRED to Central District of California. It is further ordered that all other filed motions are stayed pending transfer. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)
June 28, 2011	Filing 31 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/27/11 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTIONS in response to the Complaint 13 , 16 , 21 , 22 shall be heard on 8/3/2011 at 09:30 AM. All papers in opposition to MOTIONS filed in response to the Complaint shall be filed on or before 7/15/2011. All Reply papers shall be filed on or before 7/27/2011. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 6, 2011	Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/5/11 re 6 ORDERING that the time for the Intelius Defendants to respond to plaintiff's complaint is extended by 28 days from May 12, 2011 to June 9, 2011.(Duong, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kurtz v. Intelius, Inc et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Kurtz
Represented By:	William Richard Restis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Intelius, Inc
Represented By:	Edward San Chang
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Adaptive Marketing LLC
Represented By:	Robert James Herrington
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Intelius Sales Company LLC
Represented By:	Edward San Chang
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?