Mullen v. Office of Personnel Management et al
| Nancy Mullen |
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Office of Personnel Management |
| 2:2011cv02017 |
| August 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/14/12 ORDERING that the 11/14/12 scheduling conference is VACATED and RECOMMENDING that the 22 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint be granted and plaintiff's 20 Amended Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days; motion and amended complaint referred to Judge John A. Mendez. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/12: Plaintiff is informed that docket numbers 10, 16, 21, 25, and 26 will be disregarded, and plaintiff is directed to forego filing such documents in the future. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/14/12 ORDERING the 3/21/12 hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss, 22 , is continued to 4/25/12; On or before 4/11/12, plaintiff shall file a revised opposition to the motion in which pl aintiff responds to the numerous arguments set forth in the motion to dismiss; Failure of plaintiff to do so may be deemed a statement of non-opposition to the motion, and may result in a recommendation that the motion be granted and/or that this act ion be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with court orders and this court's Local Rules; Defendants may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition on or before 4/18/12; The status (pretrial scheduling) conference currently set for 5/16/12 is continued to 7/18/12 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24; On or before 7/3/12, the parties shall file status reports, as provided in the 8/1/11 order. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/17/2012 GRANTING 17 "More Definite Statement" construed as a Motion to Amend the Complaint, Amended Complaint due by 1/30/2012; DENYING 13 Motion to Dismiss as moot and VACATING th e 1/25/2012 Hearing. Response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint due within the time prescribed in the F.R.Cv.P. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is RESET for 5/16/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Status Report due by 5/2/2012. (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
