Aurora Loan Services LLC v. Montoya

Aurora Loan Services LLC v. Montoya

Plaintiff:	Aurora Loan Services LLC
Defendant:	Ramnar Montoya
Case Number:	2:2011cv02485
Filed:	September 19, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge:	Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit:	All Other Real Property
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 19, 2011	Filing 7 ORDER adopting 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 12/16/11. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Remand is GRANTED. This matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of CA, County of Solano. Copy of remand order sent. CASE CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)
November 9, 2011	Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/8/11 ORDERING that the Status Conference currently set for 2/16/12 is VACATED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's MOTION to REMAND 4 be granted and this matter be remanded to the Superio r Court of California, County of Solano, on the grounds that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims. The Clerk vacate all dates in this case and close the case. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Within fourteen days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 19, 2011

Filing 7 ORDER adopting 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 12/16/11. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Remand is GRANTED. This matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of CA, County of Solano. Copy of remand order sent. CASE CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)

November 9, 2011

Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/8/11 ORDERING that the Status Conference currently set for 2/16/12 is VACATED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's MOTION to REMAND 4 be granted and this matter be remanded to the Superio r Court of California, County of Solano, on the grounds that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims. The Clerk vacate all dates in this case and close the case. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Within fourteen days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aurora Loan Services LLC v. Montoya
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ramnar Montoya
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aurora Loan Services LLC
Represented By:	Sean Haig Bedrosian
Represented By:	Eric Gene Fernandez
Represented By:	Laurie Howell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?