Todd v. Bevins et al
| Derek Todd |
| Brad DeWall, Solano County Sheriff's Department and Donald Bevins |
| 2:2012cv00708 |
| March 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/13/12: Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status for appeal is REVOKED because the appeal is frivolous. (cc: USCA) (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/14/12 ORDERING that the status (pre-trial scheduling) conference presently set for 11/8/12 is VACATED; and RECOMMENDING that Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) 16 be GRANTED; The action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/1/12: Service of plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is appropriate for the following three defendants: Officer Donald Bevins, Officer Brad Dewall, and the Solano County Sheriffs Department . The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff three USM-285 form, one summons, this courts scheduling order, and the forms providing notice of the magistrate judge's availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the USM. (cc: USM) (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/23/12 ORDERING that plaintiff's 4 , 6 Motions to Amend the Complaint are DENIED as moot. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER adopting in full 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/18/12. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claims alleging violations of his due process rights provided by the Fifth and Fo urteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution are dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants. Plaintiffs claim alleging violations of his equal protection rights provided by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file his "First Amended Complaint" within 30 days of the date this order is electronically filed. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/11/12 ORDERING that 2] Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED and RECOMMENDING that: 1 Complaint be dismissed, plaintiffs claim alleging violations of his due proce ss rights provided by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants, plaintiffs claim alleging violations of his due process rights provided by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution be dismi ssed with prejudice as to all defendants, plaintiff's claim alleging violations of his equal protection rights provided by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution be dismissed with leave to amend. Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days; case referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
