Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: George Wayne Anderson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2012cv02575
Filed: October 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Health Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/3/2015 GRANTING 27 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees; Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $17,206.47 in fees pursuant to 42:406(b); and upon receipt of the $17.206.47 award, counsel shall refund to plaintiff the sum of $10,643.53 previously awarded under the EAJA. (Reader, L)
September 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/20/2013 ORDERING that attorney fees are awarded in the amount of $4,476.00, pursuant to the provisions of U.S.C. § 2414(d). (Zignago, K.)
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER 21 for voluntary remand pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g) and entry of Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/1/2013. Judgment is entered for plaintiff. (Marciel, M)
July 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/30/13 ORDERING that the Briefing Scheduled date is Extended from 8/5/13 to 9/4/13. Defendant may file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment or a Motion or Stipulation to Remand this case voluntary on 9/4/2013. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/29/13 ORDERING that the requested Extension of Plaintiff's time to file a Motion for Summary Judgment is APPROVED. Plaintiff shall file his motion for Summary Judgment 7/20/2013. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/18/2012 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to serve the Plaintiff with the Scheduling Order in Social Security Cases; ORDERING the Plaintiff to submit to the Unite d States Marshal, within 14 days, an original and 5 copies of the completed Summons, 5 copies of the 1 Social Security Complaint, and 5 copies of the scheduling order and to file a Statement with the court that such service has been completed; DIRECTING the U.S. Marshal to serve all process, without prepayment of cost, within 60 days. (cc: U.S. Marshal) (Michel, G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Wayne Anderson
Represented By: Mark J Hannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?