Von Brincken et al v. Royal et al
| Shelley Von Brincken and John von Brincken |
| Rich Fevinger, Keith Royal, Nevada County Sheriff's Department and Keith Grueneberg |
| 2:2012cv02599 |
| October 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Torts to Land |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/10/2013 GRANTING 5 Request for Judicial Notice; RECOMMENDING that the 4 Motion to Dismiss be granted; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Motion referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/3/2012 ORDERING that the hearing date of 12/12/2012 is VACATED. Hearing on defendants' 4 motion is CONTINUED to 1/9/2013 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26. Plaintiff is directed to fi le opposition, if any, to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 12/26/2012. Failure to file opposition and appear at hearing, or to file a statement of non-opposition, will be deemed a statement of non-opposition, and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than 1/2/2013. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
