Berman v. Modell

Plaintiff: John Berman
Defendant: David Modell
 
Case Number: 2:2013cv00565
Filed: March 21, 2013
 
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Referring Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
 
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed#Document Text
August 21, 2013 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/20/2013. Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss Hearing is CONTINUED to 10/9/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC). Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE on or before 9/4/2013 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of diversity jurisdiction. Defendant may file a Reply to plaintiff's Response within 7 days of service. (Marciel, M)
October 16, 2013 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/15/13 ORDERING that the Order to Show Cause 18 is discharged; and RECOMMENDING Defendant's 5/28/13 motion to dismiss 9 be granted in part; andThis action b e transferred to the USDC for the District of Maryland pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and § 1406(a). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the US District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. & #167; 636(b)(l). Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge 's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). (Becknal, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Berman v. Modell
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Berman
Represented By: Hal Wright
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Modell
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]