Berman v. Modell
||March 21, 2013
||California Eastern District Court
||Troy L. Nunley
|Nature of Suit:
||Constitutional - State Statute
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 21, 2013
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/20/2013. Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss Hearing is CONTINUED to 10/9/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC). Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE on or before 9/4/2013 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of diversity jurisdiction. Defendant may file a Reply to plaintiff's Response within 7 days of service. (Marciel, M)
|October 16, 2013
ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/15/13 ORDERING that the Order to Show Cause 18 is discharged; and RECOMMENDING Defendant's 5/28/13 motion to dismiss 9 be granted in part; andThis action b e transferred to the USDC for the District of Maryland pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and § 1406(a). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the US District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. & #167; 636(b)(l). Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge 's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.