Luman v. New Vitality Corp. et al
| Floyd Luman |
| New Vitality Corp. and Joe Theismann |
| 2:2013cv00656 |
| April 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/21/18 ORDERING the parties have not identified any authority permitting the court to reopen this case and vacate its judgment based solely on the parties' stipulation. The court therefore DECLINES TO APPROVE the parties' stipulation. Any subsequent request must be supported by authority.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/8/2017 DISMISSING the plaintiff's claims; DISMISSING this case without prejudice pending the FDA's resolution of the "new drug" question. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/1/16 ORDERING that the Status Conference and the Motion to Dismiss hearing is RESET from 8/26/2016 to 9/9/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties do not need to file a new joint status report. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/6/16 ORDERING the 16 Motion to Dismiss SET for hearing on 7/29/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, any filing dates for any supplemental briefs are governed by Local Rule 230. The status conference is CONTINUED to 7/29/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, without the need for any further joint statement. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/3/14 DENYING AS MOOT 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel; GRANTING 16 Motion to Dismiss and 20 Motion to Dismiss. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
