Samuels v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc.
Elizabeth Samuels |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. |
2:2013cv00713 |
April 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
San Joaquin |
Dale A. Drozd |
Garland E. Burrell |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/11/15: In light of the parties' settlement, this action is dismissed with prejudice. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 69 ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/13/15. A dispositional document shall be filed no later than June 6/15/2015.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 66 ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on March 13, 2015. Dispositional document shall be filed no later than May 11, 2015. Failure to respond by this deadline may be construed as consent to dismissal of this ac tion without prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. Further, in light of the referenced settlement 65 , the pending motion for summary judgment (ECF No 28 ) is deemed withdrawn, and the final pretrial conference scheduled for hearing on March 30, 2015, is vacated. (Rivas, A) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/9/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 35 Request to Seal Documents is DENIED. Further, since Local Rule 141(e)(1) prescribes that if a sealing "[r]equest is denied in full or in part, the C lerk will return to the submitting party the documents for which sealing has been denied," the documents emailed to the courtroom deputy clerk for judicial in camera consideration are treated as having been returned to the moving parties. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/13/14 ORDERING that the deadline to complete the specified depositions is CONTINUED from the current date of 11/14/14 to 1/31/2015. The parties have further agreed to and propose permitting responses to the specified outstanding written discovery requests to be served on or before 11/19/2014.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/18/14. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/14/2014 to further EXTEND Expert Disclosure Deadlines and to EXTEND discovery cut-off date. (Donati, J) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER 20 to continue disclosure deadline signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/13/2014. Initial Expert Disclosure deadline is CONTINUED to 8/22/2014. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure now due 9/12/2014. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/25/2014 GRANTING the parties Stipulated Protective Order. (Reader, L) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/13/2014 ORDERING that the parties' 16 request for entry of the proposed stipulated protective order is DENIED without prejudice. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/15/14 re: 14 EXTENDING Deadline to File FRCP 15(a) Motion to Amend Pleadings and Expert Disclosure Deadlines. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/22/13: The deadline to file a motion to amend the pleadings under FRCP 15(a) is extended from its current date of December 2, 2013 to January 31, 2014. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 11 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 7/5/13: The 7/8/2013 status (pretrial scheduling) conference is hereby VACATED; Plaintiff has until 9/30/2013, to file a motion in which leave is sought to file an Ame nded Complaint to add a new defendant; the parties have until 12/2/2013, to file a motion in which leave is sought to amend their pleadings in response to information obtained during discovery; All discovery shall be completed by 10/14/2014; Designa tion of Expert Witnesses due by 4/7/2014, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure is due by 5/5/2014; The last hearing date for a motion is 12/22/2014 at 9:00 a.m.; The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 2/23/2015 at 11:00 AM in C ourtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.., A joint pretrial statement shall be filed no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the final pretrial conference; Trial is set for 5/19/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Samuels v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. | |
Represented By: | Stephen M Hankins |
Represented By: | Sarah Diane Youngblood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Samuels | |
Represented By: | Sandra Jane Cohen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.