Waldo v. Eli Lilly & Company
Plaintiff: Angela Waldo
Defendant: Eli Lilly & Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv00789
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/15/15 ORDERING that the 76 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the 76 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot; Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Clerk to enter judgment for the defendant and close the case. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/21/15. Plaintiff shall show cause within 10 days as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Defendant shall show cause as to why the seal should not be lifted with redaction only of personal identifying information. (Manzer, C)
June 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/18/15 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is authorized to file the following documents under seal: (1) memorandum of points and authorities in support of defendant's motion for summary judgment; ( 2) declaration of Eric Rothschild in support of defendant's motion for summary judgment; (3) exhibits A through F in support of defendant's motion for summary judgment; and (4) defendant's statement of undisputed facts in support of its motion for summary judgment. (Becknal, R)
June 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/8/15 ORDERING that the Status Conference set for 6/11/15 is VACATED and Plaintiff is ORDERED, within fourteen (14) days of entry of this order, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/19/15 ORDERING after reviewing the arguments and evidence, the application is granted. The scheduling order is amended to vacate the current deadline to disclose experts by 5/15/15 as well as the dead line to hear motions to compel discovery by 6/15/15. The court will issue an amended scheduling order setting further deadlines, if necessary, following the parties' submission of their required joint status conference statement and the scheduled 6/11/15 status conference, where plaintiff is directed to appear and indicate whether she intends to seek counsel and continue pursuing this litigation. (Becknal, R)
May 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/15/15 ORDERING that the 68 Ex Parte Application is GRANTED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/11/2015 ORDERING Reilly Pozner LLP, Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP's and Jones & Keller's Unopposed Motionto Withdraw as Counsel and Memorandum in Support Thereof, and accompanying Declaration of Mark Premo-Hopkins, Esq. in Support of the Motion to Withdraw in this matter shall be SEALED; an appropriately redacted copy of the Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, and accompanying Declaration of Mark Premo-Hopkins, Esq. in Support of the Motion to Withdraw, striking any reference to communications between plaintiff and counsel, shall be filed on the public docket and served on defendant. (Reader, L)
October 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 56 JOINT PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/17/14. (Becknal, R)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/14/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's ninth cause of action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The remainder of defendant's 38 motion to dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amended complaint no more than 21 days after entry of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/7/14 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 38 is currently set for hearing on 1/13/14. The court does not find oral argument to be necessary and will decide the motion on the papers. Accordingly, the hearing on the motion is VACATED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/7/2013 ORDERING 18 Plaintiff' first, ninth, twelfth, and fourteenth causes of action are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's fourth, tenth, eleventh, thirteenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth causes of action are DISMISSED without prejudice. The remainder of defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amended complaint no more than 21 days after entry of this order. (Reader, L)
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/30/13 ORDERING Defendant's motion to dismiss is currently set for hearing on 10/7/13. (ECF No. 18 .)The court does not find oral argument to be necessary and will decide the motion on the papers. Accordingly, the hearing on the motion is VACATED. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waldo v. Eli Lilly & Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Waldo
Represented By: Thomas P. Cartmell, PHV
Represented By: Mark Premo-Hopkins, PHV
Represented By: Michael Andrew Rollin
Represented By: Christopher L. Schnieders, PHV
Represented By: Joseph J Zonies, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eli Lilly & Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?