Benyamini v. Minton
Plaintiff: Robert Benyamini
Defendant: T. Minton
Case Number: 2:2013cv01632
Filed: August 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/20/16 ORDERING that the May 16, 2016, order to show cause is VACATED; and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve process on defendant. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
May 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/13/2016 ORDERING plaintiff to show cause in writing, within 14 days, why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. P. 4(m) for failure to serve process on defendant Minton. (Yin, K)
October 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/01/15 ordering plaintiff's motions seeking court intervention in locating defendant T. Minton 20 , 21 are denied. The clerk of the court shall send to plaintiff 1 USM-285 form, instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint to be completed and returned with the Notice of Submission of Documents within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/19/15 DENYING 16 Motion for Extension of time.(Dillon, M)
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/16/2015 VACATING the 8 findings and recommendations filed on 5/13/2014; and plaintiff shall submit, within 21 days, the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff's failure to comply will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)
May 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/12/14 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/2014 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, either the $400.00 filing fee or a properly completed ifp application; plaintiff's 8/7/13 complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days; and the clerk shall provide plaintiff with the court's ifp application by a non-prisoner and a complaint form for a section 1983 action.(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benyamini v. Minton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Benyamini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Minton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?