Williamson v. CSP Solano Mailroom Staff, et al.
Plaintiff: Freddie Lee Williamson
Defendant: CSP Solano Mailroom Staff, Postmaster of the U.S. Postal Service and Gary Swarthout
Case Number: 2:2013cv01978
Filed: September 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/2/2016 DENYING plaintiff's 29 "motion of discovery". (Yin, K)
January 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/14/16 recommending that the second amended complaint 25 be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that the clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/25/2015 VACATING the 18 findings and recommendations filed 4/30/2015. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint alleging a retaliation claim in accordance with this order. Failure to comply with this order will again result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim.(Yin, K)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/29/2015 RECOMMENDING that the 17 amended complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and that the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/30/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 2 , 4 motions to proceed IFP; plaintiff shall pay the filing fee in accordance with the concurrent CDCR order; and DISMISSING the complaint with leave to amend within 30 days. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williamson v. CSP Solano Mailroom Staff, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Freddie Lee Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSP Solano Mailroom Staff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Postmaster of the U.S. Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Swarthout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?