Alford v. Ma
| Tracy Fidel Alford |
| Ma |
| 2:2013cv02493 |
| December 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/12/18 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 6/07/18, are ADOPTED in FULL; and Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 41 ) is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
46
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/07/18 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment 41 be denied. Motion 41 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
38
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/01/16 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/23/16 ordering that within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiffs failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/8/16 ORDERING that Defendants motion for leave to file a late reply brief (ECF No. 31 ) is DENIED as moot. Within 60 days from the date of this order, defendant shall file a supplemental brief addressing the issues described above. Defendants motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 26 ) is DENYING without prejudice to its renewal at the time his supplemental brief is filed.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/23/15 ORDERING that within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed a s consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiffs failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint 28 is DENIED without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/12/15 ordering that within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed co nsent to have the: a. action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and b. action dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/16/15 ORDERING that Defendants request to modify the scheduling order herein 22 is GRANTED. The Discovery and Scheduling Order 19 is hereby amended to provide that all pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before March 25, 2015. Plaintiffs motion for a court order regarding notarial services 21 is DENIED.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/25/14 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Tracy Fidel Alford to the clerk until the balance is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/06/13 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a properly completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of the court or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alford v. Ma | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tracy Fidel Alford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ma | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
