Clark v. Colvin
| Sharon Kay Clark |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| 2:2014cv00851 |
| April 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Shasta |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/2/2019 GRANTING 27 Motion for Attorney Fees. Counsel for plaintiff is awarded $13,635.50 in attorney fees under Sec 406(b). The Commissioner is directed to pay the fee forthwith and remit t o plaintiff the remainder any withheld benefits, and upon receipt of the $13,635.50 in attorney fees pursuant to Sec 406(b), counsel shall reimburse plaintiff in the amount of $10,265.77 previously paid by the government under the EAJA.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/5/2016 GRANTING 22 Motion for Attorney Fees; AWARDING the plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of TEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS AND SEVENTY-SEVEN CENTS ($10,265.77) and costs in the amount of SEVENTY-TWO DOLLARS AND EIGHTEEN CENTS ($72.18). (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/08/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; defendant's 14 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/16/15 ORDERING that the reply to the 14 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is due 05/05/15. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting plaintiff's 3 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/5/14. The Clerk is directed to issue process and to serve upon plaintiff the undersigned's Scheduling Order and Order re Consent or Req uest for Reassignment for social security cases. The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order upon the United States Marshal (USM). Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM the required documents listed in this Order, and file a declaration with the court stating the date on which the documents were submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve process with the required documents, without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clark v. Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sharon Kay Clark | |
| Represented By: | Robert Weems |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
