Kreher v. Yuba County Superior Court, et al.
| Detlef Kreher |
| Third District Court of Appeals of the State of California, County of Yuba, Yuba County Superior Court and Alana Adams |
| 2:2014cv00962 |
| April 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/2/14 ORDERING that the hearing set for July 7, 2014 is vacated; the May 28, 2014 request for judicial notice by defendants Yuba County Superior Court, Third District Court of Appeals for the State of Cal ifornia, and Alana Adams (ECF No. 5-2) is denied; the May 28, 2014 motion to dismiss by defendants Yuba County Superior Court, Third District Court of Appeals of the State of California, and Alana Adams (ECF No. 5 is granted; the June 9, 2014 motion to dismiss by defendant County of Yuba (ECF No. 6 is granted; and this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/19/14 ORDERING that the initial status conference set for 6/23/2014 at 2:30 p.m. is VACATED and will be reset, as appropriate, following resolution of defendants motions to dismiss. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
