Global Comminity Monitor, et al v. Mammoth Pacific, LP et al
| Global Comminity Monitor, Laborers' International Union of North America Local Union No. 783, Randal Sipes, Jr. and Russel Covington |
| Mammoth Pacific, LP, Ormat Nevada, Inc. and Ormat Technologies, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv01612 |
| July 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 7413 (b) Clean Air Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/24/18. The Court hereby modifies its sanctions as follows: To the extent sanctions were imposed for violating the Court's page limitations, that order is VACATED;The imposition of sanc tions based on Defendants' frivolous filings and use of footnotes is AFFIRMED; The amount of the sanctions is therefore reduced from $1500 to $750; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to disburse $750 from the $1500 collected on 1/30/2017, to Holland and Hart LLP. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
113
AMENDED MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 02/01/2017 ORDERING that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 82 , is GRANTED. However, their Motion for Leave to File Surreply, ECF No. 100 , is DENIED, and the Court imposes sanctions against Defendants' counsel in the amount of $1,500. Said sanctions shall be paid to the Clerk of this Court within 10 days, and Defendants are FURTHER ORDERED to file a notice with this Court wit hin the same 10-day period that the sanctions have in fact been remitted. Finally, in light of the resolution of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 75 , and Defendants' Motion to Exclude, ECF No. 90 , are DENIED as moot. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/5/17 ORDERING that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 82 ,is GRANTED. However, their Motion for Leave to File Surreply, ECF No. 100 , isDENIED, and the Court imposes sanctions against Defendants' counsel in the amount of $1,500. Plaintiffs' MOTION for Summary Judgment 75 , and Defendants' Motion to Exclude, 90 are DENIED as moot. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
98
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/4/16 ORDERING the page limits on all dispositive motions, any cross-motions and any responses to such motions are set at thirty (30) pages, and the page limit on reply memoranda is set at 15 pages. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting the Stipulation and Proposed Order Setting Revised Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions (ECF No. 72). Signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/17/2016. (Deutsch, S)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/10/16 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' MOTION for Leave to File and Amended Complaint 59 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/6/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff Global Community Monitor is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each party to bear its own costs and fees. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
63
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 06/17/16 ORDERING that Court SETS the following briefing schedule for 59 plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Their Complaint: filed: 06/14/16; opposition: 06/28/16; reply: 07/07/16; hearing: 07/14/16 at 2:00 p.m.; the Dispositive motion cutoff is EXTENDED to 10/06/16 and SETS the briefing schedule for dispositive motions as follows: motions filed: 08/11/16; oppositions and any cross motions: 09/01/16; reply a nd opposition to cross-motions: 09/15/16; reply on any cross-motions: 09/29/16; hearing: 10/06/16 at 2:00 p.m.; if no decision has been entered by 08/05/16 on plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend, the dispositive dates shall be EXTENDED; all other deadlines established in the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order remain in effect. (A. Benson)
|
|
Filing
54
STIPULATION and ORDER regarding discovery of financial information from Defendants signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/13/2016. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
52
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/9/16 ORDERING the court APPROVES the parties' stipulation regarding the discovery of financial information from defendants, as outlined above. However, the parties are a dvised that, to the extent that the parties agreed to produce documents or conduct other discovery beyond the deadlines outlined in the operative pretrial scheduling order, such an agreement will not be enforced by the court through formal motion practice after the applicable discovery deadline(s) have passed. As such, the parties are strongly encouraged to seek modification of the deadlines in the pretrial scheduling order from Judge England to formally facilitate such discovery efforts. Such modification may be sought by virtue of an appropriate stipulation and proposed order, setting forth good cause for modification of the scheduling order. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying defendants' 34 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 10/13/15. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
46
STIPULATION and ORDER re 38 Motion for Protective Order signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/16/2015 ORDERING discovery STAYED until Judge England issues a decision of Ormat's Dispositive Motion. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/10/15 ORDERING that no later than 09/17/15, the parties shall file with the court a stipulation and proposed order regarding a partial stay of discovery in accordance with this order. If the parties are ultimately unable to agree on an appropriate stipulation after exhausting good-faith meet-and-confer efforts, the parties shall contact the undersigned's courtroom deputy clerk to schedule a further telephonic conference. By way of this order, the court expresses no opinion concerning the merits of the pending motion to dismiss, which will be resolved by the district judge. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and 30 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/18/2015. Court staff shall not be required to execute any Disclosure Agreement, nor shall Court be required to return or destroy any copies of confidential docume nts filed or lodged with it in this case. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(f), the Court will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of terms of this Protective Order after action is terminated. Nothing in this Order shall limit testimony of parties or non-parties, or use of certain documents or information, at any Court Hearing or Trial such determinations will only be made by Court at Hearing or Trial, or upon an appropriate Motion. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/8/15 DENYING 14 Motion to Dismiss and GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 17 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff's case proceeds on the eighth cause of action only. Amended complaint due within 20 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/29/14 ORDERING the two pending Motion to Dismiss 14 17 are RESET for 11/13/14 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/30/14 ORDERING 1. Plaintiffs' electronic transmittal of documents to Defendants' counsel on July 10, 2014 constitutes effective service of the following documents on Defendants: (1) Plaintiffs' Complaint; (2) Civil Cover Sheet; (3) Summons issued by the Court; (4) Notice of Availability of Voluntary Dispute Resolution; (5) Order Requiring Joint Status Report; and, (6) Notice of Availability of a Magis trate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction and Appeal Instructions and Consent or Declination to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. 2. Defendants' Answer or other response to Plaintiffs' Complaint is due on or before September 8, 2104. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
