Vasquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Christopher Ryan Vasquez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2014cv01874
Filed: August 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/7/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of SIX THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($6,350.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §2412. (Becknal, R)
September 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/14/15 GRANTING 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 20 Motion for Summary Judgment ; and REMANDING CASE to Commissioner of Social Security. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/18/15 ORDERING Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties showing good cause for a requested extension of Plaintiff's time to file a Reply brief, the request is hereby APPROVED.Plaintiff shall file his Reply on or before June 1, 2015. (Becknal, R)
March 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/19/15 APPROVING AND ORDERING time for responding to Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment be extended to 4/24/2015. (Meuleman, A)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on January 12, 2015. Plaintiff shall file his Motion For Summary Judgment on or before February 23, 2015. (Rivas, A)
January 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION and ORDER 13 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/9/2015. Plaintiff shall file his Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 2/23/2015. (Marciel, M)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/13/14 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigneds scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. (Copy routed to USM)(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vasquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Ryan Vasquez
Represented By: Shellie Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Jacob Mikow, GOVT
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?