Smith v. Langford et al
Jeffrey Thomas Smith |
Matthew Langford, Matthew Polanco, Andrew Menard and LJ's Towing |
2:2014cv01916 |
August 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Lake |
Gregory G. Hollows |
John A. Mendez |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/14/15 GRANTING 24 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff and on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 18 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/26/15 ORDERING that the 8 and 14 Orders to Show Cause are DISCHARGED and Plaintiff's 13 Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. RECOMMENDING that the 7 and 9 Motions to Dismiss be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 15 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/10/2015 ORDERING 9 the hearing date of 2/19/2015 is VACATED; Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, no later than 2/26/2015, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure timely to file opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion; Plaintiff is directed to file opposition, if any, to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 2/26/2015. (Reader, L) |
Filing 8 ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/27/2015 ORDERING The hearing date of February 5, 2015 is VACATED. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 2/12/2015 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure timely to file opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion.(Reader, L) |
Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/17/14: Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, within ten days from the date of this order, why the court should not recommend the individual defendants be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.