Harris et al v. SSA

Harris et al v. SSA

Plaintiff:	Vinnetta M. Harris
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	2:2014cv02092
Filed:	September 9, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	San Joaquin
Presiding Judge:	Allison Claire
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 9, 2016	Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/9/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 13 is DENIED; the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment 14 is GRANTED; the clerk shall enter judgment for defendant and close the case. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
February 17, 2015	Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/12/15 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is F URTHER DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (cc: USM). (Meuleman, A)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 9, 2016

Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/9/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 13 is DENIED; the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment 14 is GRANTED; the clerk shall enter judgment for defendant and close the case. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)

February 17, 2015

Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/12/15 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is F URTHER DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (cc: USM). (Meuleman, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris et al v. SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vinnetta M. Harris
Represented By:	Harvey Peter Sackett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?