Chen v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ssuchia Chen
Defendant: Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., Pamela G. Marrone, Donald J. Glidewell and James B. Boyd
Case Number: 2:2014cv02105
Filed: September 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER. Pursuant to the Proposed Order Suspending Deadline to Respond to Consolidated Complaint and Direction Plaintiffs to File Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF No. 55), THE COURT ORDERED: Plaintiffs shall file their anticipated motion for leave to ame nd by March 15, 2016, E&Y's current deadline to respond to the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint is suspended, E&Y shall file and serve its opposition to Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend, no later than 21 days after Plaintiffs file and s erve the motion and if E&Y opposes Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend, Plaintiffs shall file and serve their reply brief within fourteen (14) days after E&Y files and serves its opposition. Order signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on March 10, 2016. (Deutsch, S)
February 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/12/2015 ORDERING that all Motions to Consolidate ( 15 , 20 , and 24 ) are GRANTED. Special Situations' Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and for Approval of Lead Counsel ( 15 ) in the above-captioned actions and all related actions consolidated under this Order is GRANTED, and the Global Investors and Marrone Investor Group motions ( 20 , 24 ) are DENIED without prejudice. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42, the actions denomi nated as Martinelli v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02055-MCE-KJN, Sausman v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02072-MCE-KJN, Chen v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., 2:14-cv-02105-MCE-KJN, Oldham v. Marrone Bio Innovations, I nc., 2:14-cv-02130-MCE-KJN, and Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02571-MCE-KJN are CONSOLIDATED. Case No. 2:14-cv-02571-MCE-KJN is designated as the "master file." The Clerk of the Court i s directed to add all complaints and answers filed in Case Nos. 2:14-cv-02055-MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02072-MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02105-MCE-KJN, and 2:14-cv-02130-MCE-KJN to the master case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close Case Nos. 2:14-cv-02055-MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02072-MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02105-MCE-KJN, and 2:14-cv-02130-MCE-KJN. The parties are directed to file a Joint Status Report, with all parties participating, pursuant to the Order Requiring Joint Status Report in the master case. The parties are directed to file all future pleadings, motions and other filings ONLY in case No. 2:14-cv-02571-MCE-KJN. (Zignago, K.)
October 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/30/14 ORDERING Without prejudice to any parties' right to seek interim relief, Defendants shall have no obligation to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until after the Court appoints a lead plaintiff and lead counsel pursuant to the provisions of the Reform Act; Defendants will meet and confer with the court-appointed lead counsel within twenty (20) days following the appointment of a lead plaintiff and le ad counsel to (a) confirm whether the lead plaintiff will file a new complaint that supersedes all previously filed complaints or deem the existing complaint operative; (b) establish a common response date for all defendants including a briefing schedule on defendants' anticipated motions to dismiss and (c) establish a date to provide the Court with the Joint Status report as set forth in the Order of September 11, 2014.(Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chen v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ssuchia Chen
Represented By: Lionel Z. Glancy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pamela G. Marrone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald J. Glidewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James B. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?