Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
Lawrence James Thomas |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2014cv02129 |
September 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/21/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for SUMMARY Judgment 18 is GRANTED; The Commissioner's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23 ), is DENIED; This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion; and The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for Plaintiff, and close this case. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER 21 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/18/2015. Defendant's due date for responding to 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 7/13/2015. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/15/15: Defendant's due date for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is extended 30 days to June 15, 2015. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/11/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED to 4/15/2015. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/6/15 ORDERING that the Commissioner's deadline for filing an Answer and the Administrative Transcript is extended from 1/1/2015, to 1/8/2015. Accordingly, the court finds that the Commissioner timely filed her Answer and Notice of Lodging Social Security Administrative Transcript. ECF Nos. 13 & 14 . (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/18/14 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is FURTHER DIRECTED t o serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the U.S. Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (cc:USM). (Meuleman, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lawrence James Thomas | |
Represented By: | Peter Brixie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Donna Wade Anderson |
Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.