Dunmore Homes, LLC et al v. North American Capacity Insurance Company
Dunmore Homes, LLC, Dunmore Laguna Reserve, LLC and Premier Indemnity Company, Inc. |
North American Capacity Insurance Company |
2:2014cv02132 |
September 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Troy L. Nunley |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/19/16 ORDERING that Defendant's 20 Motion for judgment on the pleadings, as to the second and third causes of action in Plaintiffs' first amended complaint, is DENIED. (Benson, A) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/11/2016 ORDERING 21 the cutoff for completion of Discovery is CONTINUED to 9/30/2016. (Reader, L) |
Filing 16 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/25/16 ORDERING Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 11 ), to the extent it seeks dismissal of this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, is GRANTED. Because jurisdiction has not been established, the Court makes no ruling on Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Counts Two and Three in the complaint. Plaintiff may file and serve an amended complaint within 21 days of entry of this order. (Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.