Sing v. Mineral County et al
Plaintiff: Ram Sing
Defendant: Mineral County, Sean Rowe, Stewart Hante and Mineral County Court
Case Number: 2:2014cv02170
Filed: September 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/24/2022 DENYING 22 Motion to Set Aside Revocation of IFP Status.(Perdue, C.)
November 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/25/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status is thus REVOKED. The Clerk of the Court is ordered to TRANSMIT a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Court of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for filing on the docket of Case No. 14-17224. Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 19 is DENIED. (cc Ninth Circuit)(Dillon, M)
October 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/3/14. (Kaminski, H)
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/25/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; Plaintiff's motion to stop illegal prosecution and for the appointment of an attorney, filed 9/18/14, 3 , is denied; Plaintiff's motion for order shortening time in regard to his motion to stop illegal prosecution and for the appointment of an attorney, filed 9/18/14, 4 is denied; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sing v. Mineral County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ram Sing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mineral County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sean Rowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stewart Hante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mineral County Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?