Folkens v. Wyland, et al
Pieter A Folkens |
Wyland Worldwide, LLC, Wyland Galleries, Inc., Signature Gallery Group, Inc. and (NFN) Wyland |
2:2014cv02197 |
September 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Garland E. Burrell |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/16/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff PIETER AREND FOLKENS, dba A HIGHER PORPOISE DESIGN GROUP's claims asserted in the Second Cause of Action and Third Cause of Action against Defen dants WYLAND (NFN), aka ROBERT THOMAS WYLAND, an individual, WYLAND WORLDWIDE, LLC, a California Corporation, WYLAND GALLERIES, INC., a California Corporation, SIGNATURE GALLERY GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation, dba WYLAND GALLERIES and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive as set forth in the First Amended Complaint filed in Case No.: 2:14-CV-02197-GEB-CKD are hereby dismissed without prejudice. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 58 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/06/16 ORDERING that defendants' 33 Motion for Summary Judgment on plaintiff's first claim for relief for copyright infringement as to the painting by Wyland entitled "Life in the Living Sea" of plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. (Benson, A) |
Filing 57 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 03/28/16 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/14/2016 GRANTING 47 Notice of Request to Seal Documents. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 37 ORDER RE Defendant's Request to seal documents signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/3/16. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 32 AMENDED STATUS (Pre-trial Scheduling) ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/8/16 ORDERING that all Dispositive Motions shall be filed by 3/8/2016. Hearing on such motions shall be on 4/5/2016 at 1:30 p.m.. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 5/20/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. The Jury Trial is SET for 7/11/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/31/2015 DENYING 20 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/3/2015 ORDERING 26 that the parties Stipulated Protective Order is APPROVED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/28/15. Plaintiff's sealing motion is not considered, and the documents emailed to chambers for in camera consideration are treated as having been returned to Plaintiff. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/22/15 ORDERING that the Plaintiff is granted five days leave, from the date on which this order is filed, to file the First-Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit "A" to the parties' 4/1/15 stipulation. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 7 ORDER continuing hearing signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/5/2014. Since the 6 Joint Status Report indicates matter is not ready for scheduling, the Status Conference is RE-SET for 3/9/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). A Further Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to Status Conference. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.