California State Employees Association v. Bogart
| California State Employees Association |
| Richard Bogart |
| 2:2014cv02494 |
| October 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/9/15 ORDERING that CSEA and Counterclaimant may file the Amended Answers attached to 25 Stipulation as Exhibits A and B. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/13/15. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/2/15 ORDERING the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND Bogart's claim for conversion in its entirety. The Court DISMISSES WITH LEAVE TO AMEND the "fraudulent-prong" and "unfair-prong" of Bogart's UCL claim. Finally, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND the "unlawful-prong" of Bogart's UCL claim, to the extent it is based on conversion. Bogarts Second Amended Counter-Claim must be filed within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. CSEA's responsive pleading is due within twenty (20) days thereafter. If Bogart elects not to file a Second Amended Counter-Claim, the matter will proceed consistent with this Order. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
