Riseman v. United States et al
| Bruce Riseman |
| United States and Peter Wroblicky |
| 2:2014cv02656 |
| November 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/20/2016 ORDERING the action DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE LIMITED ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/5/2016 ORDERING that the depositions of Plaintiff Bruce Riseman and Dr. Peter Wroblicky be scheduled at a mutually convenient date on or before 6/10/2016; ORDERING that the plaintiff's response to the United States' Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Requests for Production, served on or about 3/4/2016, be served by 5/2/2016; ORDERING that any motions to compel related to said discovery be filed by 6/10/2016. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/21/16 ORDERING that the United States' 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
