Neeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Jennifer Faye Neeley |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2014cv02903 |
December 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 STIPULATION and ORDER for EAJA FEES signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 01/29/16. (Benson, A) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER 23 for Remand signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/4/2015. Final decision of Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plainti ff's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as MOOT. Clerk shall enter Judgment in favor of plaintiff and against Commissioner. Parties shall promptly meet & confer regarding potention Stipulation for award of Equal Access to Justice Act fees, if any. Such a Stipulation or Motion shall be filed within 60 days. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/30/15 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment 18 . The current deadline was November 2, 2015, and the new deadline is December 2, 2015. Any Reply Thereto Shall be Filed on or Before December 22, 2015.(Becknal, R) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/30/2015 ORDERING that defendant shall file her response to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before 11/2/2015. Any reply thereto shall be filed on or before 11/23/2015. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/3/15 ORDERING IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 30 days to September 2, 2015, for filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/2015 ORDERING that the time for filing of the Opening Brief is EXTENDED to 8/3/2015. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/2/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order. The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within 14 days Plaintiff shall submit service documents to the USM and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted. (cc: USM)(Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Neeley v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jennifer Faye Neeley | |
Represented By: | Jacqueline Anna Forslund |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.