USA v. Approximately $165,499.00 in U.S. Currency, et al
United States of America |
Approximately $165,499.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $25,232.67 seized from Merrill Lynch Wealth Management Account Number 243-26197 |
2:2014mc00090 |
June 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Troy L. Nunley |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/27/15. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/6/15 ORDERING that the deadline for the United States to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 3/30/15. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/2/14: The deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant assets are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to December 30, 2014.(Kaminski, H) |
Filing 2 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/25/14 EXTENDING time to file a complaint for forfeiture or obtain an indictment alleging forfeiture to 10/1/14. (Manzer, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.