United States of America v. Approximately $65,180.00 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $65,180.00 in U.S. Currency |
2:2014mc00153 |
December 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Troy L. Nunley |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/12/15 ORDERING Upon entry of this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture, $49,380.00 of the $65,180.00 in U.S. Currency, together with any interest that may have accrued o n the total amount seized, shall be forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), to be disposed of according to law; Upon entry of this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture, but no later than 60 days thereafter, $15,800.00 of the $65,180.00 in U.S. Currency shall be returned to claimant Paul Tuzzolino through his attorney Beorn Zepp. Pursuant to the Stipulation for Consent Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court enters a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the above-described defendant currency; CASE CLOSED.(Becknal, R) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/17/2015 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 5/22/2015. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/23/2015 ORDERING the United States to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture by 4/23/2015. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION and ORDER 3 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/23/15 EXTENDING time until 3/24/2015 for filing a complaint for forfeiture and/or to obtain an indictment alleging forfeiture. (Meuleman, A) Modified on 1/27/2015 (Krueger, M). |
Filing 2 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/23/2014 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 1/23/2015. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $65,180.00 in U.S. Currency | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Kevin Christopher Khasigian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Approximately $65,180.00 in U.S. Currency | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.