McManus v. Commissioner of Social Security
David T. McManus |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2015cv00127 |
January 15, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Craig M. Kellison |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/10/2017 for the AWARD of Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM, OPINION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/30/16 GRANTING 20 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING 24 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED(Washington, S) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/11/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file his reply to Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment on or before 2/2/2016. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 19 ORDER EXTENDING TIME to file Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/21/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file her Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 10/23/2015. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/27/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file her Motion For Summary Judgment on or before 10/19/15. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/21/15 ORDERING that the 7 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. (Benson, A) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/25/2015 ORDERING 3 Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to submit service documents to the United States Marshall. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined in this order, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/28/2015 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of Court is DIRECT to issue all process necessary. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit all documents necessary to effectuate serve to the USM. (Donati, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McManus v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David T. McManus | |
Represented By: | Shellie Lott |
Represented By: | Linda Susan Ziskin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.