Buenrostro v. Buenrostro et al
| Jose Luis Buenrostro |
| Roberto S. Buenrostro and Guadalupe V. Buenrostro |
| 2:2015cv00138 |
| January 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Torts to Land |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/21/15 ORDERING that all pleadings, motion practice, and discovery in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the Findings and Recommendations by the District Judge and RECOMMENDING that the 10 Motion to Dismiss be granted and this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of matter jurisdiction. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/14/2015. Plaintiff shall file, no later than 5/5/2015, an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to pending 10 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants shall file any Reply to plaintiff's Opposit ion no later than 5/19/2015. The 6/4/2015 Status Conference is VACATED. All formal Discovery is STAYED pending resolution of 10 Motion to Dismiss for lack subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Court Assistance is DENIED without prejudice. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
