Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Lori Beth Thompson |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2015cv00167 |
January 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/20/2017 GRANTING 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. ORDERING attorney fees in the amount of $9,486.00 pursuant to the EAJ (Washington, S) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/3/2016 ORDERING that the defendant shall file a response to 24 motion not later than 30 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff's Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than 14 days from the date defendant's response is filed. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/26/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 16 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Commissioner's 19 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with this decision. The Clerk shall enter judgment for defendant. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/27/2015 ORDERING that plaintiff's 5 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Cler k of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complain t and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/2/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal in proper form in 30 days. Plaintiff shall submit her renewed request to proceed in forma pauperis, or pay the required filing fee, no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lori Beth Thompson | |
Represented By: | John Vincent Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Ellinor Ravenel Coder |
Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.