Freshko Produce Services, Inc. v. A.L.L. Groups, Inc. et al
Freshko Produce Services, Inc. |
A.L.L. Groups, Inc., J&S Partners, Jagjit Singh Saini, Sukhpreet Kaur Saini and Ashwani Kumar Mayer |
2:2015cv00234 |
January 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Fresno |
Allison Claire |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Agricultural Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/25/2016 DISCHARGING 24 Order to Show Cause; DISMISSING the 1 Complaint as to all defendants, without prejudice, subject to reopening in the event either one or both the defendants' bankruptcy petitions is dismissed or in the event the plaintiff is granted relief from the automatic stay. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/16. Freshko is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow this Court's order and for failure to prosecute under FRCP 41(b). (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/16/15 ORDERING that Freshko shall file a status report within 90 days to advise the court of the status of the bankruptcy filings; the 11/12/15 status conference is VACATED,nunc pro tunc, and his action is STAYED pending further order of the court. (Benson, A) |
Filing 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending that plaintiff's 12 Motion for Default Judgment be granted and it be awarded damages totaling $33,268.60 forvalue of delivered produce; $14,241.86 in attorney's fees and costs; prejudgm ent interest of $3,597.38 through 6/17/2015; plus $16.40 per day up until time Judgment is entered; and post-judgment interest calculated at federal rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/29/2015. These Findings and Recommendations are SUBMITTED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 14 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.