Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service
Plaintiff: Conservation Congress
Defendant: United States Forest Service
Case Number: 2:2015cv00249
Filed: January 28, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 30 U.S.C. ยง 1201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ERRATA ORDER re 64 Memorandum, Opinion & Order, Order on Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 07/01/2016. (Streeter, J)
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/30/2016 DENYING Plaintiff's 51 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Jackson, T)
June 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/2/16 ORDERING that this matter is set for Evidentiary Hearing on 6/28/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/20/2016 GRANTING 56 Joint Request for plaintiff's and defendant's counsel to appear telephonically at the hearing scheduled for 5/31/2016 at 1:30 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K)
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/23/16 denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Kaminski, H)
December 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER 40 to WAIVE remaining Local Rule 260(a) and (b) Requirements signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/10/2015. Stipulation to waive Local Rule 260(a) and (b) requirements for parties to file Statements of Undisputed and Disputed Facts with their Summary Judgment Motions is ALLOWED. (Marciel, M)
October 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/19/2015 ORDERING 25 Plaintiff Conservation Congress Motion to Determine the Scope of the Record and Supplement the Administrative Record is DENIED. (Reader, L)
October 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/16/2015 GRANTING 28 Joint Request to appear by telephone at the *10/19/2015 motion hearing set for 2:00 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K) *Modified on 10/16/2015 (Kirksey Smith, K).
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 08/25/15 ORDERING that 22 08/14/15 Stipulation and Order is AMENDED as follows: Conservation Congress shall file its motion regarding the administrative records by 08/31/15 with de fendant's reponse due 09/16/15 and plaintiff's reply due 09/23/15; Conservation Congress shall file its Motion or Summary Judgment by 11/06/15; defendants shall file their cross-motion for summary judgment/opposition by 12/11/5 and Conserva tion Congress shall file reply/opposition by 01/08/16; defendants shall file reply by 01/22/16 and the hearing on the Cross Motions for Summary Judgment will be 02/22/16 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Benson, A)
August 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Plaintiff's Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment 21 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/14/2015: Conservation Congress shall file its motion for summary judgment no later than 8/24/2015; Federal De fendants shall file their cross-motion for summary judgment no later than 9/24/2015; Conservation Congress shall file its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment and its response to the Forest Service's cross-motion no later thah 10/8/2015; and Federal Defendants shall file their reply in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment no later than 10/22/2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)
June 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER 16 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/18/2015 extending federal defendants' time to answer or to respond to the Second Amended Complaint by 7/9/2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION and ORDER 13 amending the Pretrial Scheduling Order 12 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/18/2015. Motion Hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment is reset for 11/16/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (See document for further details.) (Kirksey Smith, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Conservation Congress
Represented By: Sean T. Malone, PHV
Represented By: Andrew Gibson Ogden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Forest Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?