Joseph v. Hawkins, et al
| Alonzo Joseph |
| R Hawkins, C. Smith and W.D. Smiley |
| 2:2015cv00332 |
| February 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER for VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/24/17. Based on the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 34 ), this action is dismissed with prejudice.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/6/17 DENYING 28 Motion. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/14/16 ordering the Custodian to produce Alonzo James Joseph on 1/04/17 at 9:30 a.m. in courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. The parties shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. The assigned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy, Matt Caspar, within 30 days to schedule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. The Clerk shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff's complaint, (b) the screening order, and (c) the instant order, on Supervising DAG Monica Anderson. (cc: Monica Anderson) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/01/16. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/24/16 ordering within 30 days from the date of this order, defendant Hawkins shall file a response to the third amended complaint. The findings and recommendations 11 are vacated. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/21/2016 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall complete and return the Notice of Amendement with the required documents; the Clerk shall send plaintiff the form for filing a civil rights action. The findings and recommendations are held in abeyance pending screening of the new pleading. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/17/16 recommending that plaintiff's second amended complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/21/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 8 motion for leave to amend, as moot; plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED; and plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/10/15 ORDERING that Defendants request for screening order and extension of time 3 is granted. Defendants are relieved of their obligation to file a responsive pleading until further order of court. Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to amend. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
