United States of America v. Approximately $18,400.00 in U.S. Currency et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $18,400.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $2,600.00 in U.S. Currency
Case Number: 2:2015cv00378
Filed: February 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/23/2015 ORDERING The Court ADOPTS the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and between the parties to this action; that judgment is hereby ENTERE D against Claimant Stephen Van Horn and allother potential claimants who have not filed claims in this action; Upon entry of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture, $13,400.00 of the Approx. $18,400.00 in US Currency and $2,600.00 in US Cur rency, together with any interest that may have accrued on the total amount seized, shall be forfeited to the US pursuant to 21:881(a)(6), to be disposed of according to law; Upon entry of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture, but no later than 60 days thereafter, $5,000.00 of the Approximately $18,400.00 in US Currency shall be returned to Claimant Stephen Van Horn through his attorney Charles R. Farrar, Jr.; CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE Based upon the allegations set forth in the Com plaint filed 2/17/2015, and the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court enters this Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28:2465, that there was reasonable cause for the seizure and arrest of the defendant currency, and for the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION, signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/27/15. (Kastilahn, A)
February 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/18/15 ORDERING that the Clerk issue a Warrant for Arrest of Articles in Rem for the Defendant Currency. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $18,400.00 in U.S. Currency et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Spivak, GOVT(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately $18,400.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately $2,600.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?