Avila v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Avila v. Commissioner of Social Security

Avila v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Candelaria Avila
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	2:2015cv00461
Filed:	March 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Tehama
Presiding Judge:	Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 18, 2016	Filing 14 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 13 Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/18/16: Judgment is entered for the Commissioner. (Kaminski, H)
March 3, 2015	Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/3/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. Th e Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal (USM). Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A) (cc: USM) Modified on 3/3/2015 (Kastilahn, A).

Date Filed

Document Text

February 18, 2016

Filing 14 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 13 Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/18/16: Judgment is entered for the Commissioner. (Kaminski, H)

March 3, 2015

Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/3/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. Th e Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal (USM). Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A) (cc: USM) Modified on 3/3/2015 (Kastilahn, A).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avila v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candelaria Avila
Represented By:	Brian C. Shapiro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Asim Modi, GOVT
Represented By:	Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?